Is there any way to exclude from searches inactive members, say those that haven't been online in 90 days or more?
75% of search results show members that haven't logged in in over 90 days!
Member Login:
Inactive Members
23rd Apr 2011 - 12:06am
Re: Inactive Members
1st May 2011 - 11:34am
dreamer-365 wrote:
Is there any way to exclude from searches inactive members, say those that haven't been online in 90 days or more?
75% of search results show members that haven't logged in in over 90 days!
Is there any way to exclude from searches inactive members, say those that haven't been online in 90 days or more?
75% of search results show members that haven't logged in in over 90 days!
Have to agree gets very annoying says theres over 2500 members in my area yet only about 100 active
Surely there some way of deleting any standard members that havent logged on in 60 days or more
cant be done?? LOL what a load. its just a database...
code:
search for name, where age is greater than 30 and less than 40
gets you everyone between 30 and 40.
search for name where login_date is less than today -30 would get you everyone online in the last 30 days.
the offline time is displayed, so the data exists... its pretty trivial.
last time i checked, there are 92k users on the system. - last search i ran came up with 21 hits, 15 of them over 90 days offline. thats 2:1 odds isn't it?
you don't think that it *might* reveal the number of *active* users as apposed to *subscribed* users, and that is commercially significant? nah.. they wouldn't do that.
code:
search for name, where age is greater than 30 and less than 40
gets you everyone between 30 and 40.
search for name where login_date is less than today -30 would get you everyone online in the last 30 days.
the offline time is displayed, so the data exists... its pretty trivial.
last time i checked, there are 92k users on the system. - last search i ran came up with 21 hits, 15 of them over 90 days offline. thats 2:1 odds isn't it?
you don't think that it *might* reveal the number of *active* users as apposed to *subscribed* users, and that is commercially significant? nah.. they wouldn't do that.
dreamer-365 wrote:
cant be done?? LOL what a load. its just a database...
code:
search for name, where age is greater than 30 and less than 40
gets you everyone between 30 and 40.
search for name where login_date is less than today -30 would get you everyone online in the last 30 days.
the offline time is displayed, so the data exists... its pretty trivial.
last time i checked, there are 92k users on the system. - last search i ran came up with 21 hits, 15 of them over 90 days offline. thats 2:1 odds isn't it?
you don't think that it *might* reveal the number of *active* users as apposed to *subscribed* users, and that is commercially significant? nah.. they wouldn't do that.
cant be done?? LOL what a load. its just a database...
code:
search for name, where age is greater than 30 and less than 40
gets you everyone between 30 and 40.
search for name where login_date is less than today -30 would get you everyone online in the last 30 days.
the offline time is displayed, so the data exists... its pretty trivial.
last time i checked, there are 92k users on the system. - last search i ran came up with 21 hits, 15 of them over 90 days offline. thats 2:1 odds isn't it?
you don't think that it *might* reveal the number of *active* users as apposed to *subscribed* users, and that is commercially significant? nah.. they wouldn't do that.
You're probably right there is the commercial aspect to it, it's easier to get someone to join a site with 90,000+ members as opposed to one for example with the same number but where where you point out beforehand that about only 10 - 15% are actually actively participating on the site e.g. not logged on in ages or showing as "inactive" so you can see why they've made it so these entries can't be removed.
I have asked admin about this and they said "It's on the to do list but everyone in the office is bogged down with other stuff at the moment which is why there's been no movement on it.". I'm sure they will get to it as soon as possible.
dreamer-365 wrote:
ok. just checking in to see how this is going.... . ??
as a user i'm not really aware of other pressing issues, i'm sure there are but not seeing them mentioned here or in the chatrooms.
ok. just checking in to see how this is going.... . ??
as a user i'm not really aware of other pressing issues, i'm sure there are but not seeing them mentioned here or in the chatrooms.
Try checking back sometime next year
